AVSIG: Pt61,91,141 Reg Chngs wwswsigarch.jpg (7236 bytes)

✈ . . . . . . ✈ . . . . . ✈ . . . . ✈ . . . ✈ . . ✈ . ✈ . . ✈ . . . ✈ . . . . ✈ . . . . . ✈ . . . . . . Touch-and-Go to our Live Forum (This is a Read-only Archive of the 2004-2017 AVSIG Forum)


AVSIG Discussion Sections >> FAA Topics

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | (show all)
Mark Kolber (TTA/NC)
Public Guest


Reged: 05/17/04
Posts: 331
Loc: APA/Denver Colorado
Re: Pt61,91,141 Reg Chngs [Re: Dan Barclay [ORG]]
      #281101 - 02/14/10 01:42 PM

Quote:

It also now says that it will consist of landings at *exactly* three points.

>> with full-stop landings at three points

What are they thinking?

Dan


They weren't. Not everything is intentional. (where do you see the word "exactly"?)

Yes they pulled the word "minimum" but I'm betting that's that's an error. There's usually more than one left in when any set of regs is changed that much. I know they were were still making last minute corrections within 24 hours of publication of the final rule. That's the kind of error that's easy to make and miss, There's nothing in the Final Rule explanatory material that indicates anything other than to make a change to the single-segment distance requirement.

I'm really a bit amazed. It's not just here. Of all of the changes in the rules, it's this one - that affects exactly one reg and one flight in a way that is likely inconsequential 99% percent of the time that seems to have generated the most discussion.

--------------------
Mark Kolber
www.midlifeflight.com


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | (show all)



Extra information
0 registered and 19 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Mike Overly 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 9471

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us AVSIG

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5

Logout   Main Index    AVSIG Aviation Forum