| A few months back one of our long-time
members posted a "will it fly" question that's been flying (or not) around other
internet forums lately. The question
asks whether an airplane can take off and fly if it is accelerating on a treadmill whose
belt can exactly match the airplane's speed at any given time. He no doubt posted
the message because he was certain AVSIG would get to the bottom of it quickly and
elegantly. Well, 664 messages later, it seems
we flunked the "quickly" part of that test.
Luckily, "elegant," in depth, detail, and
presentation ... right up very almost until the exhausting two-hold-out-laden end
... remained. A number of the Sig's brightest took several hours out of their lives
to patiently explain how the "treadmill" in the problem is a red herring (the
plane will fly because its wheels can be spun-up to a zillion miles per hour by the
"treadmill" with zippo effect on the airplane's lift-creating speed through the
air) while a smaller number devoted a scale-equal number of hours to explaining that the
treadmill will in-fact cancel forward progress (and the plane won't fly).
(So who's right? Neither camp, because we tried it
right in the AVSIG Skunkworks. Our test article took off -- in stinging rebuke to
the "no fly" faction -- but immediately struck the grab-handle structure at the
end of the treadmill and flipped over -- proving that even the best engineers on AVSIG
often fail to see the forest for the trees).
The plane-on-a-treadmill exercise in the meantime spawned a
large number of "Oh yeah, if you guys are so smart, solve this" problems in our Hangar Flying
section, such as:
If a train leaves Boston at 12 p.m. heading east, but the
railroad tracks are actually part of a treadmill device that exactly matches the speed of
the train's wheels, will the train stay in Boston or plunge into Boston Harbor in 20
minutes?
and ...
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could
chuck wood and if the atmosphere around it acted as a multi-dimensional treadmill which
could ...
Well, you get the picture. Suffice it to say, AVSIG
Hangar Flying was looking like a great big dandy-pants Mensa orgy there for awhile, and we
were expecting the feds to raid us anytime.
That plane-on-a-treadmill thread and others like it make
today's AVSIG look lots like AVSIG back-when, but in many ways our 2004 move to the web
has made our Same Old Sig Not the Same Old Sig.
On the down side, it's much harder to navigate and search
messages compared to CompuServe's wonderful-but-now-defunct forum software. No web
forum software today even comes close to what CompuServe was running in 1999, though it's
certainly easier to log-in.
On the up side, something magical happened when we moved to
the web. The faces of AVSIG appeared on avatars. Then the airplanes, avionics
stacks, and dogs and cats and sons and daughters of AVSIG appeared in message
bodies. As wide-open and web-integrated as AVSIG now is, it's a much more
graphic and personal place compared to our text-only decades.
Elsewhere at 25 ...
AVSIG
People & Places
Get-together gigs still get together ... but thanks to those avatars there's less guessing
in hotel lobbies and more hook-up. (Siggers looking for other Siggers who use
Snoopy, Fred Flintstone, Superman et al. avatars have thrown some gig-togethers into minor
chaos, usually cleared by a brief explanation and a breathalyzer test).
Training
& Proficiency
Our "first stop for new aviators ... first stop for old" section is always ripe
for new aviators. We know you're out there, so please do check-in, and then please
feel free to jump right in. The number one reason new members on any online forum
are intimidated about posting messages is the fear of looking stupid, or of getting some
snippy "This question has been asked a thousand times ... why don't you do a forum
search first" reply instead of a helpful answer. After a quarter century, AVSIG
members have almost universally reached the point of knowing "go look it up" is
awfully bad form, and new members should at least expect a link to a helpful thread if one
exists. If you're a student or otherwise twenty-bucks-a-year too pinched to pop for
our annual membership fee, please ask for a free
year's membership courtesy of AVSIG's generous
longtime contributors.
Maintenance
Snake Oil Skimmed Here. Still a useful place to come for first and second opinions on care
and feeding of aircraft and powerplants.
Aviation
History
A new, semantics-reduced dimension for this discussion thanks to graphic file
attachments and other extra-textrestrial links. At least one regular denizen
has multi-mediaized the place with musical downloads from way back when found who knows
where.
Hot
Section
Wonderful insight in selected discussions, but we really need some kick-butt registered
neutri-cynics to shake-up the "Oh yeah? Chappaquiddick, Barbra Streisand, say-is-that-mayonnaise-on-your-blue-dress?"
versus the "Oh yeah? Your guy wants to put food on your family, tried to exit a
briefing room through a locked door, plus his dad threw-up all over the prime minister of
Japan" crowd. The section that everyone loves to hate recently survived its
first formal "keep it or ditch it" poll
after even a few regular participants said they just didn't like themselves in the morning
anymore.
Accidents
& Incidents
Post-accident discussions take off quickly now that everyone is a taskbar window-away from
every information source on the planet. Once upon a time it took 30 messages to
establish just what had or hadn't been said in a breaking news report; now two or three
outside links get things going just like that. A much better Lessons Learned
database is also readily at-hand thanks to the extensive archive of reports maintained by
the National Transportation Safety Board. Bottom
line: Much less time to data = much less time to insight = much more opportunity to jump
to conclusions = as always ... be careful out there.
Avionics/Gadgets/Toys
... Hardware/Software
Feel free to look for help on practically anything in these sections, as always. The
depth of non-aviation knowledge on AVSIG remains peerless.
AVSIG's Next 25 Years ...
- AVSIG's average participant age will be 104.
- There will be fish pun threads, but not on the same scale as
the AVSIG fish pun threads of the 1990s.
- Another suspected bug in the forum software will be
reported.
- A bug pun thread will be started in the above thread by
someone who claims to abhor thread drift, but no AVSIG bug pun thread will have the legs
to match even the last floundering gasps of an AVSIG fish pun thread.
- Some 104-year-old guy will start an argument with another
104-year-old guy over whether it's "flounder" or "founder."
- A 104-year-old engineer will point-out that the
"founder" vs. "flounder" discussion is in fact a red herring: that
it's all about airspeed.
- There will be affordable and practical flying cars for
everyone: You'll read it here first.
--MO
1/1/2006
Next
______________________________________________________________
AVSIG
History Notes on JBG The State of the Sig Our Contentious Little Secret What We've Learned so Far

|